Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A decreased court might not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it is actually unjust; it may only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it might either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts on the cases; some jurisdictions allow for the judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
In that perception, case regulation differs from one jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in New York would not be decided using case regulation from California. As an alternative, Big apple courts will assess the issue depending on binding precedent . If no previous decisions over the issue exist, Ny courts could possibly examine precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority rather than binding authority. Other factors for example how aged the decision is and also the closeness for the facts will affect the authority of the specific case in common regulation.
The a good amount of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made crystal clear that police is free to take action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities issue to law. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-field duties in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it correct to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified from the decision of the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief website Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
However it can be made obvious that police is free to get action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also make sure regard in the family drop in accordance with regulation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security of your house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become achieved. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated higher than. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a very criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically cause exoneration from departmental charges based around the same factual grounds. When a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Matter: Appeal At times it really is effortless for just a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce an attempt to eliminate a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it's attained this kind of stage. Read more
ten. Without touching the merits of the case on the issue of annual increases from the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, such yearly increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, demands further assessment being made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
The law of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. When the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days for your department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided through the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of youthful individuals, making sure a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fans alike.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The discovered Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced by the findings during the Impugned order, after recording of evidence on the respective parties. Read more